Making the case for small and mid-size PR agencies

More and more, less is more.

Of all trends that cross American sub-cultures, industries, and media,
nothing is winning like minimalism. From agile teams, “lean” startup
methodology and open floorplans to tiny houses, paleo living and “craft”
everything, less is better.

We associate smallness with innovation, quality, authenticity and
scrappiness.

Size matters in PR, too. Boutique and mid-size firms are in, and the
goliaths look like McAgencies. Large clients who would traditionally use
multinational firms have turned to smaller shops.

Are we all being brainwashed by Silicon Valley gospel and “Tiny House
Hunters,” or is there something to the leaner-is-better trend?

Belonging and purpose

Size changes how members of a group relate to one another. Generally, our
sense of purpose and self-worth is defined by belonging to a community or a
“Tribe,” as journalist Sebastian Junger titled his book on the subject.

In the industrial era, economies of scale were everything, and Americans
supersized their companies, subordinating individuals to the machinery of
industry and government. As Junger puts it, “Modern society has perfected
the art of making people not feel necessary.”

That pointlessness is acute in massive, impersonal companies. Movies such
as “ Club,” “ Space” and “The Matrix” were revolts against the
existential absurdity of corporate culture. The protagonists revolt against
cubicles, bureaucracy and a pointless day-to-day life.

Perhaps the flight to startups, craft brands and smaller agencies was a
reaction to the era of dehumanization and disengagement, which,
Gallup surveys assure us, continues today.

At big companies and agencies, people feel—and are—interchangeable. The
two-year account rep knows a fresh college grad can replace her, and the
company won’t suffer nor care if she leaves. At work, talented people want
to make a footprint in concrete, not on a sandy beach in a windstorm.

[RELATED: Take a two-minute comms audit—and get instant personalized results!]

Little agency, big edge

It seems big agencies crave competitive edges that a mid-size agency takes
for granted:

1.
Access to leadership

If you’re the client of a 5,000-person agency and call asking to speak with
the CEO, good luck. Countless gatekeepers protect the CEO’s time, and
frankly, the CEO has no idea what’s going on with your account. The giant
agency can afford to lose you.

The reverse is true for a small or mid-size agency. If you need to get the
CEO or VP on the phone, it happens quickly. Why does that matter? Well,
your account manager with three years’ experience might be stellar, but if
a PR crisis hits (e.g., a cyber breach), you want guidance from veterans.
I’ve seen my CEO jump into unfolding crises on Saturday afternoons.

2.
Awareness and flexibility in talent

At big firms, managers closely guard their budgets and talent. They’re not
interested in lending their star workers to a rival who’s vying for the
same promotion. At the 5,000-person agency, the managing director in San
Francisco won’t know about the rock star social media analyst in
Philadelphia who could turn around one of SF’s struggling accounts.

At mid-size agencies, we all know each other, and we know who excels at
what. I’m based in Chicago, but when I need help following AP style, I
check in with Kathleen, our grammar guru in Philly. We work flexibly, so
she can lend a hand on my project. At smaller agencies, we’re not jockeying
for resources and trying to kick rivals off the corporate ladder. Our tribe
is too small for factions.

3.
Learn it yourself (LIY)

Big agencies need machines—human machines. Efficiency, their golden calf,
comes from doing one thing repeatedly. However, creativity and
unconventional problem-solving come from a broad understanding of PR
disciplines and unrelated subjects. The jack-of-all-trades sees on the PR
canvas opportunities that the press release drone would never imagine.

The big agency says: If you don’t know what you’re doing, find or pay
someone who does. The mid-size agency believes in LIY: Learn it yourself.

4.
A marketplace of ideas

If you work for a 5,000-person agency and want to pitch an audacious idea
to the CEO, good luck. He or she doesn’t have time for you, and the
corporate ladder jockeys are afraid your brilliant ideas will overshadow
theirs. Grassroots innovation is highly unlikely at companies structured as
top-down, hierarchical firms.

One of our accounts was launching a wireless generator that you could take
into the wilderness with you to power your campsite. Without asking anyone,
I pitched it as “Netflix and Chill While Camping With Portable Energy Hub.”
It was a risk (one reporter thought it was inappropriate), but it
ultimately paid off with decent coverage. I could not have done that at a
McAgency.




5. Best idea, not ‘best practice’

A “best practice” is, to me, an oxymoron. Once an action has been encoded
in rigid processes and documentation, it’s on the highway to obsolescence.
Big agencies love best practices, because they’re comforting:
“Look at our success; we’ve always done this; let’s keep doing that “best
practice.” Innovating in environments shackled by best practices is like
trying to brainstorm with blindfolds on your eyes and duct tape on your
mouths.

In small agencies, we have histories and legacies, but we have
significantly less procedure. I can go to my team and say we’re
trying something different without kowtowing up a chain of executives for
. Perhaps that what’s one way to measure innovation: The fewer
people you need permission from, the more you’ll experiment.

Jake Katz is the media relations director at SSPR.

(Image via)

[ad_2]

You might also like More from author

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.