The winner’s curse, a finding based on economic theory, should concern brands. It’s the idea that the winner of an auction tends to pay more for the goods than they’re worth. And it’s worrying because more media than ever is bought via auctions. Two of the fastest growing media, programmatic display and paid search, are auction-based. The global spend on these media was over $158bn in 2018 according to WARC / Statista.
The phrase “winner’s curse” dates back to the 1950s when a spate of oil companies significantly overpaid at an auction for Alaskan drilling rights. Some paid so far over the odds that they went bust. Economists, such as Richard Thaler, investigated the problem and came up with an elegantly simple explanation.
Thaler, one of the world’s most renowned economists, believes that during an auction each bidder makes a private valuation of the goods and then bids up to that amount. Due to a phenomenon known as the wisdom of the crowds the average of all those valuations is reasonably accurate. After all, averaging out the valuations will balance out the errors that each bidder makes. But of course, if the average valuation is accurate, then the winning bid – the most optimistic in its valuation – must be inflated.
If The World Zigs, Then Zag
Auctions are here to stay. Brands can’t ignore them. Instead they need to adapt their bidding tactics by creating a contrarian set of metrics to identify their audience.
Most brands judge the value of an impression by looking for signals about age or income. Say, targeting 18–34s or ABC1 25–54s. However, since this method is commonplace, any brand that uses it will enter highly competitive auctions. And the more participants there are in an auction, the more accurate the average bid and the harder it is to avoid the winner’s curse.
However, since so many brands are formulaic in their targeting approaches, there are plenty of under-exploited opportunities for savvy brands. One such approach is to target a broader range of people but focus on reaching them at opportune moments. This is a sensible approach as there’s plenty of evidence that people’s receptiveness to ads varies from one context to another.
The Power Of Context
The exact context each brand should target will vary, but in our research we have spotted a number of common themes:
- People are more receptive to ads when they’re in a good mood.
- Funny ads become funnier when they’re watched in groups.
- Consumers splurge on discretionary items far more after they have been paid.
- People are prone to switching brands when their life has been destabilized by a big event, like moving or getting married.
The list goes on.
Best of all, these contexts are easily identifiable and able to target due to the data captured when consumers are online. Facebook, for example, can target ads to those who have just moved or got married. So, the digital transformation which exacerbates the winner’s curse also provides a solution.
Brands that use these contextual signals to identify their audience, rather than relying on tired, demographic data, will gain a competitive advantage by avoiding the winner’s curse.
Richard Shotton is Head Of Behavioral Science at MG OMD the author of The Choice Factory, the best selling book about applying behavioral science to advertising.
The Blake Project Can Help: Accelerate Brand Growth Through Powerful Emotional Connections
Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Growth and Brand Education
FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers